PostHeaderIcon How Google’s New Local SERP Affected Your Ranking



Posted by number1george

This post was originally in YOUmoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author’s views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of SEOmoz, Inc.

As you probably noticed, last week Google did a pretty big makeover of its local search results page, incorporating the local results directly within the organic results. In some cases it appeared that the old “7-Pack” was just given larger real estate on the SERP. In others, it just looked like the websites were just given links to their Places page. And sometimes, it just looked like an entirely new SERP, different than both the original organic rankings and the lettered, local results. But what was the real effect this change had on local search results?

How I Got My Data

Visually, the new local search results page includes information from the both website and the business’s Places page. The title and description are taken from the website but select information from the Places page is also included as well as a direct link to the Places page in Maps. Here we see an example of a search for "tanning salon seattle wa" and how the combined results are displayed.

An example of a new local SERP in Google

To find out the effects of combining the results, I grabbed the rankings of 50 somewhat random websites we’ve been tracking. As an initial criteria, I tried to use sites we’d been tracking for at least 2 months. I also eliminated sites with substantial fluctuations in their rankings within the prior few weeks since there would be no way to attribute those changes to any particular factor. Lastly, though I originally intended to use a completely random sampling, I eventually skipped over several sites that had no change since several of these were in non-competitive areas where they pretty much dominated all other websites for their searches.

After I had my sample, I did some quick research, comparing the organic rankings of several websites prior to the change to their rankings after the change. I then performed the same search in Google Maps in order to determine how their Places pages were ranking individually.

Example of Google Maps SERP

With a few exceptions, the top 7 ranked results in Maps are what were displayed in the old 7-pack for the same search. These listings were ranked independently of the organic results beneath them. By comparing their former organic ranking to their current organic ranking, I was able to see if a change could be correlated to their Places page’s ranking in Maps.

So, Was There Any Change?

Of the 50 websites examined, 30 of them had an improvement in the new, “combined” results while 6 of them dropped. In most cases, this shift in their ranking could definitely be attributed to the performance of their local listings.

The Good

First, let’s look at the ones that improved. I did eliminate 4 outliers but, for the most part, you can see a direct correlation between the sites’ improved ranking and their local ranking in Maps. Obviously, I can’t publish any actual websites or keyword searches, but the searches all used a typical local query consisting of “business/service city st”.

Local searches with a positive change

Generally, it can be said that sites performing well in both organic and local perform even better in the new consolidated SERP. In several cases you can directly see how a well-performing Google Places listing now pulls up your organic ranking.

In some instances, the combined performance of a business with both a decently ranking website and Places page was enough to push it up a rank or two in the new results. In others, it appears that a well-optimized Places page was able to significantly improve a decently performing website and increase its ranking by several spots. Basically, your local listing’s performance appears to be a significant ranking factor in the new organic results.

The Bad

Since a business’s local listing has the ability to positively affect its website’s performance organic results, let’s look at the ones that dropped in ranking to determine if there is a negative factor associated with the new SERP.

Example of searches with a negative change

First, the fact that the sample size I was able to obtain was so small already implies that a poorly performing business listing doesn’t seem to have much of an effect on a website’s performance. Looking at the original rankings, you can also see that 3 of these sites weren’t doing that great to begin with. In fact, it would probably be fair to assume that their drop was due to an already negative trend. But what about the websites that were doing well but dropped after the update?

Digging deeper into these, I soon discovered that this wasn’t really a direct result of the poorly performing business listings dragging the websites down, but rather that, due to the local results being buried so deep in Maps, Google didn’t associate a business’s Places page with their website. As a result, other websites that did have strong Places pages were ranking higher. So, while having a poorly ranked local listing didn’t penalize the website, it was a whole category of optimization that the website was lacking. Almost like having a great inbound linking strategy but no content structure.

Other Observations

While going through dozens of various local searches, there were a few things that stood out:

  • Directory listings appear to be showing up more frequently in local results, in some cases taking up the top 3 spots in results.
  • The 7-Pack, or rather one-line business listings similar to the old 7-Pack, aren’t gone entirely. Lettered results still tend to show up when Google isn’t entirely sure you’re trying to do a local search. Typically, this happens in searches for smaller cities or regions.
  • When using rank-checking tools, the one-lined, lettered listings won’t be counted – just like before. The larger results being discussed here, however, are treated just as normal organic results prior to the change, completely disregarding the letter and local information assigned to it.
  • Lastly, while I encountered plenty of websites on the first page without a Places page, I encountered very few Places page ranking on the first page without a website. Prior to the change, it was not uncommon to regularly see local listings with no associated website ranking in the 7-pack. Now it appears that, without a website, it is nearly impossible to be in the first page of Google’s general SERP for most searches.

What Does This Mean?

So what can we learn from all this? Basically, it’s just what Google said all along – everything is important. Your best bet is to have both a terrifically optimized website and an optimized, claimed Places page to associate with it.

Not only does Google seem to use a Places page as an organic ranking factor, but having one also gives you nearly twice the real estate devoted to your business in the results. Instead of just having a few words in your title tag and meta description to sell your business, you now have your address, phone number, reviews, lists of other websites that mention you, and even a picture to draw attention to your website.

Bottom line: all those old debates about whether it was better to have the top-ranking website in organic or have your business at the top of the 7-pack are over. Even if this isn’t the final layout, it’s clear that Google intends to make both count.

Do you like this post? Yes No


Similar Posts:

The In-Content Ad Leader Buy and Sell text links Health and Beauty Store

Article Source: The Only Yard For The Internet Junkie
If you like all this stuff here then you can buy me a pack of cigarettes.

Comments are closed.

Free premium templates and themes
Add to Technorati Favorites
Free PageRank Display
Categories
Archives
Our Partners
    飞鹰蜘蛛池_百度搜索
    搜索热点
    1台风海贝思致92死 621万
    2GRF代表正式辞职 368万
    34000年前文字食谱 364万
    4产妇丈夫讲述遭遇 359万
    5二宫和也结婚 354万
    6WADA想让孙杨禁赛 348万
    713吨包裹烧成灰 347万
    8SHOO日本出道延期 343万
    9李菁菁宣布退圈 330万
    10公安部通缉逃犯 300万
    11蒙托利沃退役 297万
    12林志玲婚宴遭抵制 265万
    13天气预报冷到发紫 257万
    14今日头条被约谈 253万
    15长江现死亡江豚 235万
    16斯坦李去世一周年 223万
    17韩国贩卖儿童 222万
    18比利亚宣布退役 203万
    19辽宁抚顺市地震 202万
    20蔡元培故居再出售 193万
    21selina前夫承认新恋情 167万
    22华为发放20亿奖金 157万
    23蔡徐坤赴英国进修 145万
    2420岁体操选手去世 132万
    25丢火车名字不吉利 128万
    26东航平安备降南昌 124万
    27中国联通被约谈 102万
    28澳门又发大红包 100万
    29储蓄率全球最高 98万
    30双十一总成交额 97万
    31圆明园马首回家 85万
    32鹤唳华亭开播 83万
    33北京提前一天供暖 79万
    34浙大女生案二审 70万
    35江姐托孤信曝光 66万
    36哪吒涉嫌抄袭起诉 65万
    37韩国宰5万头猪 64万
    382020年高考报名 64万
    39徐根宝获特别奖 63万
    40唐嫣怀孕后封面 60万
    41李佳琦被放鸽子 58万
    42大象死于致命干旱 56万
    43黑龙江大雪封高速 55万
    44杜江给霍思燕的信 55万
    45獐子岛扇贝又死了 53万
    46质疑天猫双11造假 49万
    47女童眼睛被塞纸片 46万
    48腾讯广告翻车 45万
    49毒杀云雀被刑拘 44万
    50金球奖候选名单 43万
    收起工具时间不限所有网页和文件站点内检索
    搜索工具
    百度为您找到相关结果约10个

    飞鹰蜘蛛池_百度图片

    image.baidu.com  - 查看全部103张图片

    菠菜词寄生虫排名接单2019-新闻资讯

    7天前 - 飞鹰荡寇】 【龙门镖局预告】 【正午视觉】 【塌鼻子隆鼻前后对比...蜘蛛池出租:2122716646 ...

    可靠极速赛车微信群_百度__百科

    2019年11月6日 - 飞鹰计划1】 【乐事微电影】 【沧州师范学院贴吧】 【太阳神风湿灸】 ...蜘蛛池出租:2122716646 ...

    池州市人民代表大会常务委员会关于接受徐华兵辞...-池州市人民政府

    2019年11月1日 - 因工作变动,徐华兵请求辞去池州市人民检察院检察长职务。根据《中华人民共和国地方各级人民代表大会和地方各级人民政府组织法》第二十七条的规定,池州...

    县教育局调研凤池学校教育工作_苍南政府网

    2019年11月1日 - 10月31日上午,县教育局党委书记、局长兰准凯、县教育局党委副书记吴海龙等一行6人,在灵溪学区负责人的陪同下调研凤池学校教育工作。 兰局长一行首先参观了校园,...

    清理荷池护碧水 - 华声在线

    2019年11月8日 - 清理荷池护碧水2019-11-08 16:43:47 [来源:华声在线] [作者:辜鹏博] 11月7日,长沙市岳麓区桃子湖,工作人员在清理荷叶。当天,长沙城投集团组织...

    飞鹰女侠在线观看-飞鹰女侠迅雷下载 - 天空影视 - 免VIP抢先观看...

    2019年10月23日 - 飞鹰女侠剧情:2009年,好打抱不平的女侠飞鹰(杨紫琼)时常有惩奸除恶之举,深受市民爱戴,她的表面身份是名媛淑女鹭鹭警察局长认为飞鹰的气焰有损警队威严...

    赛车信誉群-中娱网

    2019年11月6日 - 飞鹰荡寇】 【神武赌鬼】 【米雷娜】 【美吻电影城】 【江西单独二胎...蜘蛛池出租:343004401 ...

    公司账户哪里有买�

    2019年11月5日 - 飞鹰荡寇】 【泰瑞根水晶】 【维也纳大学排名】 【我没有伤心】 【steal...蜘蛛池出租:2122716646 地址: 北京市丰台区长辛店留霞峪10号 邮编: ...

    哪个网站可以买银行卡�

    2019年11月5日 - 蜘蛛池出租:2122716646 一手企业网银 首页 【古代奥运会的创始人】【other是什么...【日光峰林飞鹰】 【醴陵好声音】 【龙魂天下之华夏三国】 阅...
Related Links
Resources Link Directory Professional Web Design Template